zlacker

Less spam, less ad fraud, less cheating, etc

>>charci+(OP)
Be honest, what you really want is for the web to orient itself in a direction where users get to make fewer "illegal" copies of content produced by corporations. Never mind the fact that their computers might not support, even in theory, the level of DRM the corporations want.

>>36866372

>>howint+1I
You want to go into these conversations in good faith, but when they're so transparently not being had in good faith, it's tough to do so.

I'm trying to figure out how to balance assuming the best and treating every comment as if it's an individual argument, while also not being completely naive to the fact that a nontrivial number of the people making these arguments are very often blatantly pro-DRM and are asking me to just pretend that they're not. It's definitely not everyone, but...

>>charci+(OP)
I don't agree that it'll affect spam and I couldn't care less about ad fraud or cheating.

What is does do, is afford the major players total control over which devices and individuals are allowed to access the web.