zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. patch_+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-07-25 06:58:31
I think that depends a bit on context. If I am at home, and my neighbors are advertising an open Wi-Fi network, I’ve never taken that as an invitation to connect and use it. However, if I’m at coffee shop Foo and I see “Foo Guest” advertised, then sure…
replies(1): >>doctor+h3
2. doctor+h3[view] [source] 2023-07-25 07:27:17
>>patch_+(OP)
Does that also give you the right to sniff their network and steal their email passwords?
replies(1): >>dumpst+Nr3
◧◩
3. dumpst+Nr3[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-07-26 01:43:43
>>doctor+h3
No it doesn't. Imo, that would be both poor etiquette, and a violation of trust.

While I do remember hearing about Google Maps vehicles connecting to open WiFi networks in the news, I don't recall hearing about private credentials being published. Was that the case? I thought it was just a map of open WiFi networks that was published with basic details such as SSID?

Edit: I found the article (2010, holy cow does time fly). It looks like they did collect payload data for non-encrypted traffic. Even though the data wasn't published in any way, I must agree that they went too far. I would have no issue if they were to simply verify that they could connect and record basic info such as SSID, but collecting payload data from network requests was inappropriate.

[go to top]