zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. cobbzi+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-07-24 23:49:04
“There is a tension between utility for anti-fraud use cases requiring deterministic verdicts and high coverage, and the risk of websites using this functionality to exclude specific attesters or non-attestable browsers. We look forward to discussion on this topic, and acknowledge the significant value-add even in the case where verdicts are not deterministically available (e.g. holdouts).”

See, don’t worry, they’re thinking about you, holdout.

replies(1): >>userbi+lg
2. userbi+lg[view] [source] 2023-07-25 01:46:49
>>cobbzi+(OP)
We look forward to discussion on this topic

Also known as "we'll read what the opponents say, and keep trying to poke them with convincing-sounding arguments until they surrender."

[go to top]