zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. MikeTh+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-07-23 22:23:20
On the one hand I 100% agree

On the other hand we've got the phrase "Programs for the poor become poor" for a reason. Having a program that benefits everyone means that we all can support it out of enlightened self-interest.

We can reduce overhead by providing food for everyone and not putting in place a complex government bureaucracy to carefully approve some people but not others, to give lobbyists a chance to advocate for the benefit of their constituents at the expense of everyone else, etc, etc.

replies(1): >>duskwu+J1
2. duskwu+J1[view] [source] 2023-07-23 22:33:21
>>MikeTh+(OP)
Moreover, if free food is only available to low-income students, having to eat that food can become a symbol of poverty, and some students may feel ashamed to receive it. Making it available to all students, without reservation, avoids that.
replies(2): >>pessim+e4 >>l33t23+Xj
◧◩
3. pessim+e4[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-07-23 22:50:30
>>duskwu+J1
Also, you can literally lower the quality of the food.
◧◩
4. l33t23+Xj[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-07-24 01:01:57
>>duskwu+J1
People say that, but it’s not like they have a flashing light that says “TIMMY IS POOR AND THIS LUNCH IS FREE,” they just punch their code or swipe their card or whatever and it rings up as free.
[go to top]