zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. notpus+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-07-22 08:13:01
https://waterfox.net/ to the rescue.
replies(1): >>turquo+v2
◧
2. turquo+v2[view] [source] 2023-07-22 08:48:54
>>notpus+(OP)
Surely you don't mean Waterfox that states in their FAQ[0]:

"Who owns Waterfox?"

"System1 now own Waterfox, but Alex Kontos is still leading the direction of Waterfox and will be for the foreseeable future."

And who's owner, System1, states at the top of their page[1]:

"System1 operates the most dynamic Responsive Acquisition Marketing Platform

Connecting high intent customers with advertisers at scale"

[0]: https://www.waterfox.net/docs/faq#5-who-owns-waterfox [1]: https://system1.com

replies(2): >>notpus+Be >>willyw+Pw4
◧◩
3. notpus+Be[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-07-22 11:24:22
>>turquo+v2
I surely do mean exactly that particular Waterfox. I've had my fair share of concerns back in the day when System1 acqui(hi)red Waterfox, but I haven't seen any suspicious behaviour whatsoever so I'm pretty confident it's fine for the time being.

Of course, if you know a better browser (that is not Chromium-based), I'll be happy to hear your suggestions!

◧◩
4. willyw+Pw4[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-07-24 01:08:48
>>turquo+v2
Get with the times, Waterfox is independent of System 1 now. https://www.waterfox.net/blog/2023/07/03/a-new-chapter-for-w...
[go to top]