zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. rjbwor+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-07-20 13:23:17
If they wanted to promote competence then the damages would be applied to the corporation for implementing the vulnerability, not on the attacker for exposing it. This way, corporations are given a shield for being incompetent and can place the blame and damages upon an individual that brings them to light.
replies(2): >>CPLX+Bc >>loup-v+Ng
2. CPLX+Bc[view] [source] 2023-07-20 14:20:01
>>rjbwor+(OP)
“Promoting the competence of” does not require actual competence. Exposing incompetence undermines that promotion.

The government is a lot more concerned with the image, and its effect on trade, over the substance.

3. loup-v+Ng[view] [source] 2023-07-20 14:36:23
>>rjbwor+(OP)
Oh, if you want to actually raise competence, sure. But they meant projecting the image of competence.
[go to top]