zlacker

My ex certainly wasn't boring. But they certainly were physically abusive. I don't believe that automatically qualifies someone as deserving of credit.

>>beebma+(OP)
I don't think anyone would claim that not being boring is the only worthwhile measure of a person. But assuming nobody wants to be around a person who is causing harm purposefully, I'll take interesting over boring.

I'm sorry about your ex, and I hope you have the support you need.

>>beebma+(OP)
Abuse is hella boring. We’re all tired of it

>>beebma+(OP)
Being physically abusive automatically cancels any credits you may have for any other qualities.

>>Christ+N8
that's incredibly simplistic and lacking in empathy.

there are people with serious psychological disorders such that they can't control negative impulses and behaviors. Some people are born or develop an empathy void, but they are still human beings. Yes, we need to make sure they don't harm others, but pissing on them doesn't help you or anyone else, so why do it? All men are created equal, judge not lest ye be judged, ChristianGeek.

"Judgement is Mine." - Your Friend

>>fsckbo+sj
The comment you’re replying to was not serious. It’s irony highlighting the nonsensicality of the replied sentiment.

>>Aerbil+9K
I think their statement stands pretty well as a serious one because credit is social, and paid to those who play by a set of rules. If you are a physically abusive person, society will discredit you. Case in point Will Smith.

>>Aerbil+9K
Can I ask how you are so sure of that? Fascinated by your confidence on this one - maybe even jealous actually… Curious!

>>Whacky+3q1
I gave it a bit of thought, and remembered that there are people in the other side of the world (America) who are deep down in modernism (esp. feminism in this instance) who can really believe in that (abuse cancels all other good qualities). You're right, my mistake to assume people are as mentally healthy as they're in my country.