zlacker

[parent] [thread] 6 comments
1. pdanpd+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-07-18 13:42:00
Does this require some special test environment (special OS, special builds of firefox/chrome)?

Because for me chrome vs firefox (both 115)

  - ubuntu desktop: 148(+-2.2) vs 126(+-6.5)
  - android phone: 95.8(+-2.0) vs 78.5(+-4.3)
So it looks like chrome is faster and delivers a more stable performance while firefox is slower and more inconsistent on performance
replies(5): >>tekni5+w6 >>gorhil+D7 >>mccr8+Q9 >>pdanpd+ii >>jeffbe+oE
◧
2. tekni5+w6[view] [source] 2023-07-18 14:03:43
>>pdanpd+(OP)
I get 260 for chrome & 160 for firefox on win 10.
◧
3. gorhil+D7[view] [source] 2023-07-18 14:07:30
>>pdanpd+(OP)
Extensions can have a measurable effect on the benchmark, be sure both browsers have no extension, or the same extensions with the same configuration.
replies(1): >>pdanpd+Pf
◧
4. mccr8+Q9[view] [source] 2023-07-18 14:15:10
>>pdanpd+(OP)
The linked graph is for Firefox Nightly (currently 117) running on Windows.
◧◩
5. pdanpd+Pf[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-07-18 14:33:39
>>gorhil+D7
Chrome has ublock and very few others, Firefox only ublock

I suppose it is about nightly 117

◧
6. pdanpd+ii[view] [source] 2023-07-18 14:41:46
>>pdanpd+(OP)
Small update: Firefox 117 on Android phone 75.4(+-6.4) so still there
◧
7. jeffbe+oE[view] [source] 2023-07-18 15:56:33
>>pdanpd+(OP)
Adding my anecdotes: on an M2 mac mini

  - chrome 114: 472 ± 30
  - firefox 115: 390 ± 22
  - firefox 117: 420 ± 12
[go to top]