zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. insani+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-07-18 12:42:05
Maybe FF should take some tips on those UI "smoke and mirrors". What feels faster is what users are going to go off of. For example, a page that fully loads in 1 second vs a page that incrementally loads in 1.5 seconds - the latter may feel faster because the time to start loading is faster.
replies(3): >>causi+d2 >>ndiddy+l9 >>WhereI+7P
2. causi+d2[view] [source] 2023-07-18 12:55:04
>>insani+(OP)
Not to mention that the things the user wants to see are probably early in the load order and all the worthless garbage is coming in later.
replies(1): >>Electr+4g
3. ndiddy+l9[view] [source] 2023-07-18 13:30:37
>>insani+(OP)
That makes the user experience worse though. Anyone who's had a webpage layout change while they were trying to interact with it knows how frustrating it is.
replies(1): >>insani+kg
◧◩
4. Electr+4g[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-07-18 13:54:41
>>causi+d2
Those SPA-filled days, all I get on those "early load order" pages are blinking blank rectangles and spinners.
◧◩
5. insani+kg[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-07-18 13:55:33
>>ndiddy+l9
Sometimes. The big offender here is advertising.
6. WhereI+7P[view] [source] 2023-07-18 15:51:14
>>insani+(OP)
Pretty much this, the overall feel of Chrome is snappier and the UI/UX is much better

I'm still not a fan of the latest UI revision on Firefox.. Chrome is able to make me forget there is an UI

I remember switching to Chrome because of a new UI update many years ago (performance too)

If Firefox manage to catch up performance wise, I might give it another try

[go to top]