zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. number+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-07-17 16:16:22
But if you need a translation for the translation...
replies(2): >>Gloomy+Lk >>anigbr+Tk
2. Gloomy+Lk[view] [source] 2023-07-17 17:36:39
>>number+(OP)
You don’t need a translation for hundred-year-old poetry. You might need a dictionary, mainly for archaisms (and I mean words that were already archaisms at the time). That said, I don’t like this translation.
3. anigbr+Tk[view] [source] 2023-07-17 17:37:19
>>number+(OP)
You don't. You just need to work a bit harder.
replies(1): >>number+fk2
◧◩
4. number+fk2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-07-18 07:19:39
>>anigbr+Tk
Or work even harder and read the original
[go to top]