zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. mattbe+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-07-15 19:14:11
Would automated paraphrasing not be a derivative work of the original?
replies(1): >>visarg+Np1
◧
2. visarg+Np1[view] [source] 2023-07-16 10:45:39
>>mattbe+(OP)
So you think any paraphrase of a copyrighted phrase is in copyright violation? That's like owning the idea itself. Is any utterance similar to this one now forbidden?
replies(1): >>mattbe+GI2
◧◩
3. mattbe+GI2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-07-16 19:15:24
>>visarg+Np1
I think if you automate paraphrasing from an original work to use that original work on bulk somehow, yes.

How do you even automate paraphrasing without training it on lots of original work? It's infringement all the way down.

[go to top]