Mullvad
Brave
Opera
Vivaldi
Microsoft
Heck zoho is in on a browser now
What net gain does each of these companies provide over skinning chromium that isn't in Firefox?
Last time I asked brave fanboys why they don't redskin Firefox and the response was "Firefox is pita to build" all the while we have projects like palemoon and waterfox that are hobby projects. If they can work with firefox, so could someone else but no
i would use it daily if the UI/UX was better, or more similar to firefox
I did. When we folded less than two years later, one of the CTOs biggest stated regrets was that he went with Firefox instead of Chromium. The extension story in Firefox was easily 10x harder. Interfacing with the OS as well. Getting dbus services to work was a fool's errand.
Thunderbird also works.
I happen to own a brwoser extension and have both chromium and Firefox extensions. I kinda know myself.
GNU/Hurd is also a very interesting alternative OS, the design is a lot more elegant than GNU/Linux, it's still under active development and it has a surprising number of active users.
It's still a very bad idea to build the foundation of your tech stack on it.
By your logic, opera was having their own engine till 2013. So what?
[0] https://blogs.opera.com/africa/2022/05/free-data-with-opera-...
[1] https://www.androidpolice.com/2020/01/21/opera-predatory-loa...
Mullvad, is the Tor Browser with the Mullvad VPN included, and released 2023. However, the Tor Browser, which it effectively is, is from 2002.
Brave, the one in this article, is from 2019.
Opera is from 1994.
Vivaldi is from 2015, and is developed by Opera's previous dev-team after a bad sale to a Chinese company.
Microsoft's first browser, Internet Explorer, is from 1995.
I can not comment about Zoho's browser, as i know little about it.