zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. Sohcah+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-07-13 17:30:04
Think cores instead of clock speeds.

In the case of cloud instances, doubling cores is frequently less than 100% more expensive.

replies(2): >>The_Co+H1 >>moreli+Z2
2. The_Co+H1[view] [source] 2023-07-13 17:36:21
>>Sohcah+(OP)
Increasing core count is not really vertical scaling. It's a hybrid between vertical and horizontal scaling, having some characteristics of both. It also tops out quite early (especially its cost-effectiveness for many use cases, but there's an absolute upper limit as well).
3. moreli+Z2[view] [source] 2023-07-13 17:40:28
>>Sohcah+(OP)
https://aws.amazon.com/msk/pricing/ prices scale linearly with CPU beginning with m5.large, and I wouldn't really want to run a production Kafka on anything less than m5.xlarge. (They do at least keep linearly scaling all the way up.) Speculating wildly, I could probably have run some of our real clusters on the equivalent of a 8xlarge, but of course 32 core systems were not widely available at that time. The cluster I run today, even a hypothetical 48xlarge would struggle.

YMMV for non-managed stuff, but really, you can only bump cores like 3 times realistically, 4 if you started really shitty, before you start getting into special pricing brackets.

[go to top]