What are you on about? The technology we are talking about is created by 3 labs and all 3 assign a large probability. How can you refute this with what kind of credentials and science?
>>arisAl+(OP)
Unfortunately for you, that's not how the whole "science" thing works. The burden of proof lies with the people who are dreaming about these doomsday scenarios.
So far we haven't seen any proof or even a coherent hypothesis, just garden variety paranoia, mixed with opportunistic calls for regulation that just so happen to align with OpenAI's commercial interests.