I would say:
1) This feels like trying to control encryption. When anyone can build and run it, who ensures compliance?
2) the answer from the megacorps seems to be “ban research unless we do it, trust us”
3) OAI has proven it’s not trustworthy with its stated goals and mission, doing the fastest 180 from “open nonprofit” to closed “create a regulatory moat for us, trust us” profit grab.
4) this therefore smacks of regulatory capture kabuki for profit and trans national state sponsored monopoly creation
5) totally my opinion, but maybe the answer to rogue super intelligence is everyone having a super intelligence at their disposal such that any one super intelligence is checked and balanced by a population rather than some “open” company developing a single sky net and waving superalignment “trust us”
Our actions and how it creates our reputation matters. I’d say the opposite - OAI is the wrong place to work and there are hundreds of AI shops springing up and tons of OSS AI work. Democratize AI, don’t build an AI monopoly.
But that’s just my take :-)