zlacker

[parent] [thread] 0 comments
1. mindsl+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-07-02 15:15:05
Sorry. I wasn't saying that your comment was based on poor technical understanding. I was making that judgement about GP's strawman of your comment.

I'd be interested in hearing what you have to say from the technical side, in case it contains any information that is new to me. Personally, I model things such that if a closed software/system has access to some information, it will backhaul, store, and abuse that information (if not immediately, then in the future). I'm not going to hang my hat on a hope that some companies aren't functioning as optimal surveillance machines!

FWIW I don't find privacy policies themselves particularly enlightening because they're generally vague, equivocating, and subject to change at whim. Sure technically if there weren't a "privacy policy" then you might theoretically have some legal right of action to go after a company for abusing your information (although good luck demonstrating real damages, as always). But at least in the US that feels completely hypothetical.

[go to top]