zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. saboot+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-07-02 02:10:34
That wasn't possible, having Lieberman's vote was required, and he said no to anything like that
replies(1): >>889135+se
◧
2. 889135+se[view] [source] 2023-07-02 05:01:56
>>saboot+(OP)
Plus, health care spending is like >10% of GDP. You don't rewrite the rules like that with upsetting a great deal of corporate interests. An appreciable number of people benefit from all the inefficiency in delivering health care.
replies(1): >>autoex+wf
◧◩
3. autoex+wf[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-07-02 05:13:23
>>889135+se
> An appreciable number of people benefit from all the inefficiency in delivering health care.

Not anything close the the number of people who suffer from the all the inefficiency in delivering health care, but guess which has more money to bribe lawmakers with

[go to top]