zlacker

IMHO, most users of git don't care about the D, they just want a VCS that does network operations faster (CVS and SVN are painful when your server is on the wrong continent) and/or supports a better fork/merge flow.

Centralized VCS makes a lot of sense in a corporate flow, and isn't awful for many projects. I haven't seen a lot of projects that really embrace the distributed nature of git.

>>toast0+(OP)
Git was a lot better than svn when working on the train. Create some commits while riding to the job, and push them while in meetings

>>toast0+(OP)
I figure plenty of people wouldn't really mind if you left out the decentralized part specifically, but I assumed a bunch of nice things about git are there because they were basically required for a decent decentralized workflow.