zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. justin+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-06-27 14:25:49
Note that the lawsuit was filed back in 2017, so it seems to have been working its way through the legal system for a few years at this point.
replies(1): >>xethos+B5
2. xethos+B5[view] [source] 2023-06-27 14:46:21
>>justin+(OP)
That's actually a seperate lawsuit, unrelated to the class action in the headline.
replies(1): >>justin+F7
◧◩
3. justin+F7[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-27 14:54:16
>>xethos+B5
Oh thanks. My misunderstanding then. :)
replies(1): >>cududa+751
◧◩◪
4. cududa+751[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-27 19:20:37
>>justin+F7
The original plaintiff in the 2017 lawsuit popped into the comments section of the parent article, and did quite an amusing "AMA" sort of thing there. He makes a great point by saying something like "I filed this lawsuit in 2017, which means they were made aware of this practice 6 years they're doing this, and are apparently still doing it."

Interesting that the top comment on this thread now is cautioning skepticism on the claims.

[go to top]