zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. mock-p+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-06-25 23:38:05
I mean the argument goes that ‘true’ Einsteins, Edisons, and Teslas wouldn’t be so easily distracted.
replies(5): >>mhuffm+k6 >>lvncel+o31 >>Shawnj+UD1 >>TimesO+IK1 >>dragon+yW1
2. mhuffm+k6[view] [source] 2023-06-26 00:31:57
>>mock-p+(OP)
> ‘true’ Einsteins, Edisons, and Teslas wouldn’t be so easily distracted.

... or maybe they didn't have the distractions and that was key?

3. lvncel+o31[view] [source] 2023-06-26 10:21:41
>>mock-p+(OP)
I wouldn't agree with that argument, though. What does 'true' in that sense even mean? Do we as a society want to weed out the easily distractible or do we want to ensure that more people are able to flourish?

Is a potential 21st century Einstein somehow "less valuable" because his surroundings ensured he could live up to his potential?

4. Shawnj+UD1[view] [source] 2023-06-26 14:34:08
>>mock-p+(OP)
You can easily rebut that…no, they would, if you make a library with 90% porn in it they would have a harder time doing research in that library than a normal one.
5. TimesO+IK1[view] [source] 2023-06-26 15:05:37
>>mock-p+(OP)
Feynman loved to go to strip clubs, so it is totally possible to be a genius and a perv.

Time management is key.

6. dragon+yW1[view] [source] 2023-06-26 15:45:55
>>mock-p+(OP)
True Franklins wouldn’t be so much distracted as fueled by it.
[go to top]