zlacker

[parent] [thread] 13 comments
1. jokowu+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-06-25 19:31:38
Well .... They won't get the brightest
replies(3): >>civili+j1 >>smeej+y1 >>solige+D1
2. civili+j1[view] [source] 2023-06-25 19:40:17
>>jokowu+(OP)
The recruitment pipeline for enlisted personnel is a bit different from officers, which requires a college degree.
replies(1): >>webmav+p2
3. smeej+y1[view] [source] 2023-06-25 19:42:23
>>jokowu+(OP)
They don't want the brightest.
replies(2): >>infamo+L3 >>menset+4X
4. solige+D1[view] [source] 2023-06-25 19:43:09
>>jokowu+(OP)
I’m sure men of all intellectual abilities are driven relatively equally by their cock.
replies(2): >>chillb+f4 >>HKH2+ad1
◧◩
5. webmav+p2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-25 19:48:50
>>civili+j1
Please don't conflate formal education with intelligence.
◧◩
6. infamo+L3[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-25 20:00:12
>>smeej+y1
Brightest by what measure?

It seems like you're placing a lot of weight on the kind of intelligence that favors office work and ignoring all of the artists, builders, monks, healers and leaders whose names fill history books.

Brightest by your measure rarely get mentioned. Not to say historical impact is the most valuable metric, but it begs the question of what is your measure of brightness good for?

replies(1): >>mock-p+C91
◧◩
7. chillb+f4[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-25 20:02:49
>>solige+D1
Swayed maybe, but definitely not controlled equally.
◧◩
8. menset+4X[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-26 03:29:09
>>smeej+y1
The ‘brightest’ can’t even figure out how to reproduce above replacement levels…
replies(1): >>namari+FV4
◧◩◪
9. mock-p+C91[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-26 05:57:36
>>infamo+L3
Brightest by virtue of thinking for themselves. The military is famously opposed to that sort of thing.
replies(1): >>torste+PL3
◧◩
10. HKH2+ad1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-26 06:32:16
>>solige+D1
Can someone saying or doing something infuriatingly stupid make no difference to how sexually attractive they are?
replies(2): >>johnny+U32 >>solige+mB2
◧◩◪
11. johnny+U32[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-26 13:54:47
>>HKH2+ad1
In reality, no. If you're attractive you and your actions will be perceived differently, and you can do a surprising amount of things in generak if you look like you fit in (attractive or not, but usually being attractive helps). There are hundreds of case studies of this over the decades.
◧◩◪
12. solige+mB2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-26 16:17:06
>>HKH2+ad1
Sexually attractive, no. But if someone is considering a long term prospect/wife then absolutely.
◧◩◪◨
13. torste+PL3[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-26 21:41:45
>>mock-p+C91
I'm sorry if that was your experience in the military, but it emphatically isn't what I've experienced, and is the extreme exception to what I've seen others experience.
◧◩◪
14. namari+FV4[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-27 09:27:28
>>menset+4X
This idiocracy meme is part of the distraction. Proletariat literally means "breeders". The elites very much know they need to keep the number of heirs limited while expanding the base of exploitable populace.
[go to top]