zlacker

[parent] [thread] 16 comments
1. EMCyma+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-06-22 17:40:54
I would sign up for lemmy but it requires an email
replies(1): >>InCity+Y1
2. InCity+Y1[view] [source] 2023-06-22 17:48:36
>>EMCyma+(OP)
Did you manage to sign up for reddit without one?
replies(5): >>omgmaj+E4 >>uabstr+j6 >>EMCyma+da >>nickst+Hf >>yomlic+Gg
◧◩
3. omgmaj+E4[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-22 17:58:35
>>InCity+Y1
Yes, this used to be a feature of Reddit, not sure if it still is.
replies(1): >>junon+je
◧◩
4. uabstr+j6[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-22 18:05:15
>>InCity+Y1
You used to be able to do this, but e-mail has been required for some time.

Over on Lemmy, it is the instance operator's choice whether or not to require e-mail, but most instances currently do as a measure to mitigate bot signups.

replies(1): >>Sprock+xx
◧◩
5. EMCyma+da[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-22 18:20:54
>>InCity+Y1
You can leave the field empty during signup.
◧◩◪
6. junon+je[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-22 18:37:30
>>omgmaj+E4
It used to be a feature of the entire internet, really. Email based signups weren't common in the infancy.
replies(2): >>omgmaj+zE >>johnny+jq1
◧◩
7. nickst+Hf[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-22 18:43:22
>>InCity+Y1
Yes I have many reddit accounts without an associated email.
◧◩
8. yomlic+Gg[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-22 18:48:18
>>InCity+Y1
Yes, it still is last I checked you just have to dodge a (mild) dark pattern they added suggesting otherwise.
◧◩◪
9. Sprock+xx[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-22 20:00:11
>>uabstr+j6
At least on old reddit, you can click "next" when it asks you for your email to skip that step.
replies(2): >>o_cho+EB >>Seattl+8Y
◧◩◪◨
10. o_cho+EB[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-22 20:13:44
>>Sprock+xx
Yeah, unfortunately, it only works on old reddit. It's quite amusing to see how they treat old and new reddit as entirely different platforms.
◧◩◪◨
11. omgmaj+zE[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-22 20:24:42
>>junon+je
Yeah, I remember. I was born in the eighties. In my opinion this should still be a feature of the internet, remembering your username and password should be enough for a lot of things. Protection against bots can be achieved in any number of ways and there already exists ways to use temporary emails so I don't really get why most places still require you to use an email.

Edit: I mean, I do get it, I just don't like it.

replies(1): >>junon+2A2
◧◩◪◨
12. Seattl+8Y[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-22 21:53:08
>>Sprock+xx
My experience has been your account will quickly get shadowbanned if you don't provide email.
replies(1): >>johnny+7q1
◧◩◪◨⬒
13. johnny+7q1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-23 00:53:03
>>Seattl+8Y
I've even used burner emails and have been shadowbanned. email-less account definitely wouldn't get traction.
replies(1): >>Seattl+L02
◧◩◪◨
14. johnny+jq1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-23 00:55:05
>>junon+je
spam/bots grew out of control. You need to do something to curtail that, and email verification seems to be the most seemless solution.

That said, I've had a burner email for as long as my personal email for this very reason. I even have 2 burner gmails. It's not exactly a huge invasive measure like a phone number (which I'd never give to a site that isn't trying to take payments. Hell, still haven't given Amazon my phone number).

replies(1): >>junon+eC2
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
15. Seattl+L02[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-23 06:41:02
>>johnny+7q1
This was also my experience when I tried to register a custom domain. The only thing that worked for me was using a Gmail account that I had used with other, older, accounts.
◧◩◪◨⬒
16. junon+2A2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-23 12:14:37
>>omgmaj+zE
I feel you. Things were nice and easy back then, before the greater population came and made everything terrible and spammed the daylights out of everything.
◧◩◪◨⬒
17. junon+eC2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-23 12:27:40
>>johnny+jq1
I agree with you, just was an observation about how things changed.
[go to top]