zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. Gareth+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-06-13 07:14:55
It depends if one interprets "trad wife" to mean "far-right cultural atavism" or "traditional wife." I try to listen to those who subscribe to the movement, and they report the latter, every time. It seems those who interpret it as "far-right cultural atavism" refuse to actually listen to the women who find meaning in the lifestyle. Inasmuch, I see these articles strongly linked, and I find the juxtaposition really interesting.
replies(2): >>akpras+46 >>debok+jj
2. akpras+46[view] [source] 2023-06-13 08:01:46
>>Gareth+(OP)
The Onion clearly takes the former reading in their piece. I mean, it's barely subtext:

- "I wanted to live all my internalized misogyny"

- "Replenishing the white race is a full time job in itself"

- "A feminist cut me off in traffic once"

- "I believe in choosing a marital structure from an arbitrary point in human history and pretending it represents some kind of inviolable rule.”

But if you find value in juxtaposing these two, more power to you.

replies(1): >>Taikon+Ch2
3. debok+jj[view] [source] 2023-06-13 09:54:59
>>Gareth+(OP)
"Trad wife" AKA people subscribing to traditional Christian ideas of marriage are very much "far-right cultural activists" from the feminist perspective.

Traditional Christian ideas about marriage (i.e. stay-at-home mom, breadwinner husband, the wife willingly submitting to her husband's authority, the husband willingly sacrificing his own ambitions for the good of his family, etc.) are very much not in line with feminism. While these people won't call themselves "far right cultural activists" they do have to reject feminism in order to have a consistent worldview, and feminists would definitely call them something along the lines of far-right.

I do agree that far-right is a misnomer, "religious right" or "socially conservative" might be a better fit. My point is that "far-right cultural atavism" and "traditional wife" are the same thing from different perspectives.

replies(1): >>badpun+352
◧◩
4. badpun+352[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-13 18:31:53
>>debok+jj
An "activist" is someone who "use direct, often confrontational action, such as a demonstration or strike, in opposition to or support of a cause.". Whereas these people are not activists, they merely live according to their values.
replies(1): >>debok+M54
◧◩
5. Taikon+Ch2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-13 19:18:36
>>akpras+46
I used to like The Onion before they got super preachy...
◧◩◪
6. debok+M54[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-14 07:02:03
>>badpun+352
You are right. However, that doesn't stop others from calling them activists. If you are on the so called "far right," then merely living out your values seem like activism to those who are opposed to you.
[go to top]