zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. jacque+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-06-12 21:38:24
Agreed, but this is something that has been going on for decades. Their excuse - believe it or not, I can dig up the source if you want - is that as long as nobody looks at the data it is ok to have it. I thought that was being incredibly economical with words, clearly that is not the intent of the law.
replies(1): >>mc32+E
2. mc32+E[view] [source] 2023-06-12 21:41:43
>>jacque+(OP)
It's ironic that this is what all repressive governments do. They hold data and when they need it they spring it. But I guess this escapes them -or maybe not.
replies(1): >>jacque+72
◧◩
3. jacque+72[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-12 21:48:54
>>mc32+E
It escapes them but it shouldn't.
[go to top]