zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. tjoff+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-06-12 18:41:43
Really hope it succeeds!

Maybe there could be an low-effort area where you don't get paid.

I get the site is targeting creators, but I also get the impression that it is about general discussions etc? As a user it feels weird to give equal money to a discussion as someones awesome multi-month project, especially since there will probably be more discussions than awesome multi-month projects.

I really like the lurk for free but pay to participate approach. Getting paid however feels like a possible distraction that might just overcomplicate things, both technical and moderation+incentives. I don't think most people would be doing it for the money (and for most people it would at best be pocket change anyway). Getting rid of ads is the killer-feature that hopefully builds a good community, I guess/hope.

Getting people to enter their credit cards is probably harder than the actual amount, so the appeal of getting the money back is still red in the balance-sheet for pocket-change amounts.

My biggest gripe is that payments kills anonymity (which some might see as a big thing).

replies(1): >>bee_ri+R2
2. bee_ri+R2[view] [source] 2023-06-12 18:51:33
>>tjoff+(OP)
It could be interesting to be able to mark a bits of content as dependents, and have them pay a portion of their reward to the parent. This could be recursive.
[go to top]