zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. m45t3r+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-06-06 17:28:53
> Framework laptops are insanely expensive for again, worse hardware.

1199 EUR is not insanely expensive, specially considering that I can put up-to 64GB of RAM in a Framework laptop with a reasonable amount of money, while I would need to pay almost the price of a full Framework laptop to do the same in a Macbook Pro [1]. This is IMO, insanely expensive.

And yes, I can definitely use those amount of memory during mass rebuilds that I sometime like to do in NixOS. I don't even try to do those same workloads in my macOS because they start to become hugely slow once you hit the swap.

[1]: by the way, this get even worse considering that I also need to upgrade from an M2 Pro to M2 Max to have the option to do so. I just did a quote for the cheapest Macbook Pro with 64GB of RAM, and I got a 4000EUR quote for 512GB of storage that is laughable low for something that expensive. At that price, I can get 2 of the most expensive Framework AMD and I would still have sufficient money to get another one of the older Intel ones as a spare.

replies(1): >>kaba0+i5
2. kaba0+i5[view] [source] 2023-06-06 17:49:28
>>m45t3r+(OP)
Mind you, the two kinds of RAM are not directly comparable.
replies(1): >>m45t3r+Ge
◧◩
3. m45t3r+Ge[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-06 18:30:28
>>kaba0+i5
Sure, I never said so. It doesn't mean that there isn't workloads that benefit from more RAM (even if it is slower) or that the Apple's RAM prices are insane.
replies(1): >>thx-27+Fg
◧◩◪
4. thx-27+Fg[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-06 18:41:04
>>m45t3r+Ge
Not to mention I can't find anything on them having ECC capabilities but I could be wrong.
[go to top]