zlacker

[parent] [thread] 6 comments
1. idiots+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-05-31 19:52:30
ugh, discord is basically IRC. There's a reason we don't use IRC for everything. I hate that it's replacing everything.
replies(2): >>411111+U2 >>xg15+U4
2. 411111+U2[view] [source] 2023-05-31 20:03:47
>>idiots+(OP)
No? It's more like a BB with inbuild live voicechat, streaming etc.

IRC itself doesn't provide a shared history, threading etc.

You could get there with alternative clients and bots (at least if all participants use the same), but calling that IRC is a stretch

replies(1): >>idiots+hA
3. xg15+U4[view] [source] 2023-05-31 20:11:25
>>idiots+(OP)
Discord reuses the IRC "aesthetic" with "servers", channels and slash commands, but the actual structure of the conversations is much more like a forum.
replies(1): >>adastr+M5
◧◩
4. adastr+M5[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-31 20:15:10
>>xg15+U4
In what way? It’s still time based instead of topic based.
replies(2): >>xg15+08 >>squeak+p9
◧◩◪
5. xg15+08[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-31 20:23:57
>>adastr+M5
I think it depends how the server is structured. You can also have "threads" which are topic-based inside a specific channel.
◧◩◪
6. squeak+p9[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-31 20:29:05
>>adastr+M5
You can turn any top-level message in a room into a Thread. I don't ever really see that used though, and I don't believe it bumps the thread when there's a new message (then again neither does Reddit).
◧◩
7. idiots+hA[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-31 22:55:33
>>411111+U2
threading isn't particularly impactful if 90% of discussions don't use it.
[go to top]