zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. doctor+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-05-26 17:48:08
Hear, hear! The problem is that browser complexity has exploded to the degree that at this point it seems impossible for a small team to reinvent the wheel. Who wants to write a web assembly engine from scratch, let alone the rest?

My main browser has been Waterfox which I update manually, which doubly insulated me from this. But don't misunderstand...I hate pretty much all browsers now, too.

replies(2): >>i2cmas+X7 >>guraf+Yb
2. i2cmas+X7[view] [source] 2023-05-26 18:29:22
>>doctor+(OP)
Meh. Webassembly has polyfills. I think an incremental approach wouldn't be as hard as people make it out to be but someone does have to sit down and do it.
3. guraf+Yb[view] [source] 2023-05-26 18:50:43
>>doctor+(OP)
> Who wants to write a web assembly engine from scratch

Webassembly engine is one of the simpler things to implement in a browser. It's essentially a giant switch statement in a loop.

> let alone the rest?

But who said a new browser has to implement everything from scratch? Why couldn't a browser use well established libraries for things like image decoding, webasm, JavaScript, font rendering, webrtc, http, etc?

[go to top]