zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. freedi+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-05-26 16:37:24
All directly or indirectly ad-supported business models will sooner or later come to the point of breakage in serving user”s best interests, as the fundamental misalignment of incentives between the business and its users creates a force too strong to contain.

This is entirely driven by a simple fact that in ad-supported businesses users are not the same as the customers.

I advocated several times and will do it again - Firefox should completely embrace a freemium browser business model, align incentives with its users, and attempt to have a second golden age (first was 2005-2010).

replies(1): >>whoist+m4
2. whoist+m4[view] [source] 2023-05-26 16:54:03
>>freedi+(OP)
Agreed. I can't help but think that giving normal, technical users a great browser, and then catering on bended knee to enterprises for a very controllable, supported, extended version as the source of revenue that supports the normal browser is a sustainable model. Maybe not a model that takes over the world, but one that sustains development of a good open source browser.
replies(1): >>bee_ri+I7
◧◩
3. bee_ri+I7[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-26 17:09:43
>>whoist+m4
Are there any open source projects run like that? The closest thing I can think of is, like, Chromium but they don’t really make a framework that anyone can customize, they are inextricably tied to Google, right?

IMO open source works best as a community implementing small, single-purpose programs, which the users can integrate however they’d like. Web browsers have gotten too monolithic and the internet has gotten too over-complicated for a healthy open source web browser to exist.

replies(1): >>whoist+Ni1
◧◩◪
4. whoist+Ni1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-27 02:12:17
>>bee_ri+I7
Red Hat?
[go to top]