zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. aragil+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-05-26 07:53:59
No, it was a trademark issue, raised by Mozilla (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=354622) and seemingly resolved on their (Mozilla's) end (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=815006). For what it's worth, the recent Rust trademark issue seems to be of a similar vein (and the justifications around the Firefox sound like those used in Rust).
replies(2): >>PrimeM+T8 >>accoun+2Lb
◧
2. PrimeM+T8[view] [source] 2023-05-26 09:19:38
>>aragil+(OP)
Thanks for clarifying!
◧
3. accoun+2Lb[view] [source] 2023-05-30 16:05:47
>>aragil+(OP)
Can you provide any evidence that the User Agent name was a trademark issue. As in the name exposed to websites. Because that is the only thing that matters here and also where everyone claims to be a variant of Mozilla for compatibility.
[go to top]