zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. ChrisC+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-05-16 19:03:53
Imagine calling empathy a virus.
replies(3): >>Karuna+02 >>mdp202+d3 >>Hideou+Z4
2. Karuna+02[view] [source] 2023-05-16 19:13:21
>>ChrisC+(OP)
That term is a bit of a unwarranted meme but it's hard to take seriously the idea that there is not a problem when the model will unquestioningly write hagiography for blue president but absolutely refuse for red one.

At the end of the day, these kind of limits are artificial, ideological in nature, do not address a bona fide safety or usability concern, and are only present to stop them getting screamed at. It is not accurate to present that kind of ideological capture as anything to do with "empathy".

3. mdp202+d3[view] [source] 2023-05-16 19:19:12
>>ChrisC+(OP)
> empathy

Not the same thing. I would not go there: let us remain on the prospected regulation of technology, in this case, and reserve distinctions for other conversations. This initiative could have drastic consequences.

4. Hideou+Z4[view] [source] 2023-05-16 19:25:13
>>ChrisC+(OP)
Choosing to let millions die rather than saying a racial slur is not "empathy": https://twitter.com/aaronsibarium/status/1622425697812627457...
[go to top]