zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. etiam+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-05-16 16:57:56
The expert you set as the bar is purely hypothetical.

To the extent we can get anything like that at all presently, it's going to be people whose competences combine and generalize to cover a complex situation, partially without precedent.

Personally I don't really see that we'll do much better in that regard than a highly intelligent and free-thinking biological psychologist with experience of successfully steering the international ML research community through creating the present technology, and with input from contacts at the forefront of the research field and information overview from Google.

Not even Hinton knows for sure whats going to happen of course, but if you're suggesting his statements are to be discounted because he's not a member of some sort of credentialed trade that are the ones equipped to tell us the future on this matter, I'd sure like to who they supposedly are.

replies(1): >>Random+h8
2. Random+h8[view] [source] 2023-05-16 17:34:36
>>etiam+(OP)
Experts don't get to decide but society, I'd say; you need - dare I say it - political operators that understand rule making.
[go to top]