zlacker

You've never had a tool that is potentially better than you or better than all humans at all tasks. If you can't see why that is different then idk what to say.

>>adamsm+(OP)
LLMs are better than me at rapidly querying a vast bank of language-encoded knowledge and synthesizing it in the form of an answer to or continuation of a prompt... in the same way that Mathematica is vastly better than me at doing the mechanics of math and simplifying complex functions. We build tools to amplify our agency.

LLMs are not sentient. They have no agency. They do nothing a human doesn't tell them to do.

We may create actual sentient independent AI someday. Maybe we're getting closer. But not only is this not it, but I fail to see how trying to license it will prevent that from happening.

>>adamsm+(OP)
> or better than all humans at all tasks.

I work in tech too and don't want to lose my job and have to go back to blue collar work, but there's a lot of blue collar workers who would find that a pretty ridiculous statement and there is plenty of demand for that work these days.

>>api+U2
I don't think we need sentient AI for it to be autonomous. LLMs are powerful cognitive engines and weak knowledge engines. Cognition on its own does not allow them to be autonomous, but because they can use tools (APIs, etc.) they are able to have some degree of autonomy when given a task and can use basic logic to follow them through/correct their mistakes.

AutoGPTs and the likes are much overhyped (it's early tech experiments after all) and have not produced anything of value yet but having dabbled with autonomous agents, I definitely see a not so distant future when you can outsource valuable tasks to such systems.

>>api+U2
Sentience isn't required, volcanoes are not sentient but they can definitely kill you.

There's multiple both open and proprietary projects right now to make agentic AI, so that barrier don't be around for long.