zlacker

And this is why I always hate how computer parts are named with biological terms.... a neural network's neuron doesn't share much with a human brain's neuron

Just like a CPU isn't "like your brain" and HDD "like your memories"

Absolutely nothing says our current approach is the right one to mimic a human brain

>>lm2846+(OP)
>a neural network's neuron doesn't share much with a human brain's neuron

What are the key differences?

>>lm2846+(OP)
The human brain works around a lot of limiting biological functions. The necessary architecture to fully mimic a human brain on a computer might not look anything like the actual human brain.

That said, there are 8B+ of us and counting so unless there is magic involved, I don't see why we couldn't do a "1:1" replica of it (maybe far) in the future.

>>lm2846+(OP)
> a neural network's neuron doesn't share much with a human brain's neuron

True, it's just binary logic gates, but it's a lot of them and if they can simulate pretty much anything why should intelligence be magically exempt?

> Absolutely nothing says our current approach is the right one to mimic a human brain

Just like nothing says it's the wrong one. I don't think those regulation suggestions are a good idea at all (and say a lot about a company called OpenAI), but that doesn't mean we should treat it like the NFT hype.

>>lm2846+(OP)
Internal differences do not necessary translate to conceptual differences. Combustion engine and electric engine do the same job despite operating on completely different internal principles. (Yes, it might not be a perfect an analogy, but it illustrates the point.)

>>logica+W3
Nobody knows tbh.