zlacker
[parent]
[thread]
4 comments
1. sumtec+(OP)
[view]
[source]
2023-05-16 12:44:33
wait they are talking about licenses for giant arrays and for loop interactions? I know I am wildly oversimplifying, but yes that is nonsense.
replies(3):
>>throwa+ip1
>>itroni+uC1
>>twelve+RN1
◧
2. throwa+ip1
[view]
[source]
2023-05-16 19:25:25
>>sumtec+(OP)
It will probably require restricting GPU sales among other things.
◧
3. itroni+uC1
[view]
[source]
2023-05-16 20:27:31
>>sumtec+(OP)
just rename everything to ML, in fact you could start a company and call it OpenML
replies(1):
>>sumtec+tp3
◧
4. twelve+RN1
[view]
[source]
2023-05-16 21:29:15
>>sumtec+(OP)
well there was a time not too long ago where cryptography-related code was pretty heavily regulated, too
◧◩
5. sumtec+tp3
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2023-05-17 12:16:50
>>itroni+uC1
hehe, I was thinking "Loops With Rules".
[go to top]