zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. CSSer+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-05-12 22:06:20
Why did you choose AGPLv3?
replies(1): >>rubenf+C
2. rubenf+C[view] [source] 2023-05-12 22:10:24
>>CSSer+(OP)
I love open-source and wanted it to be open-source but given that's our whole product and not just a part of a bigger ecosystem, and given that we intend to commercialize mostly the large enterprise audience, we needed to have a reason for the legal departments of those enterprises to push to buy our commercial license. So otherwise said, we do not want to employ dark patterns and want it to be as easy as possible to self-host but also need to be sustainable as a company. Most features that you would expect to be premium plugins are baked-in and open-source (sso, audit logs, smart autocompletion on the webeditor, etc etc)
replies(1): >>brunoq+Hq
◧◩
3. brunoq+Hq[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-13 02:03:33
>>rubenf+C
> In addition, a commercial license grants you a dedicated engineer to transition your current infrastructure to Windmill, support with tight SLA, audit logs export features, SSO, unlimited users creation, advanced permission managing features such as groups and the ability to create more than one workspace.

From the README. It sounds like a commercial license is needed for SSO and that the free version has a limited number of users.

replies(1): >>rubenf+BE
◧◩◪
4. rubenf+BE[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-13 04:43:49
>>brunoq+Hq
Sorry that's obsolete, we will remove it from the Readme!

The updated paragraph:

> In addition, a commercial license grants you a dedicated engineer to transition your current infrastructure to Windmill, support with tight SLA, and our global cache sync for high-performance/no dependency cache miss of cluster from 10+ nodes to 200+ nodes.

replies(1): >>brunoq+OG
◧◩◪◨
5. brunoq+OG[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-13 05:06:04
>>rubenf+BE
No worries, thanks!
[go to top]