zlacker

[parent] [thread] 6 comments
1. mdanie+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-05-12 01:58:11
Another approach would be to allow the players to input their own OpenAPI key, to take the load off of ever how many Lakera have behind this
replies(2): >>atoav+lm >>benliv+73i
2. atoav+lm[view] [source] 2023-05-12 05:41:25
>>mdanie+(OP)
Is inputing your API key on some random (sorry to the creator) website really a good idea?
replies(2): >>8organ+uo >>averev+Gp
◧◩
3. 8organ+uo[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-12 05:58:16
>>atoav+lm
It's not. Eventually we'll have OAuth and that will be the preferred approach.
replies(1): >>malaya+vq
◧◩
4. averev+Gp[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-12 06:07:40
>>atoav+lm
In general not, but openai has made a wonderful job of key management with instant revocation,soft and hard limits, and alerts all the way.

I can confidently experiment by generating a new key, and I'll only ever lose a dollar, as my threshold is fairly low and matches the usage in my own projects.

replies(1): >>hacker+WP
◧◩◪
5. malaya+vq[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-12 06:13:37
>>8organ+uo
Curiously, they already have something like that already. If you take a course on deeplearning.ai (I tried ChatGPT Prompt Engineering for Developers), you can run a notebook that accesses OpenAI API. If you look closely, you'll notice they authenticate not with an API key but with a temporary JWT token that gets handed to you when you start a lesson. I don't know how they do it, but it's certaily possible.
◧◩◪
6. hacker+WP[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-12 10:11:59
>>averev+Gp
not everyone will do this though. security is meant for the idiot users
7. benliv+73i[view] [source] 2023-05-17 19:50:14
>>mdanie+(OP)
Another approach would be to let players host their own instance to keep their API key private. I'm available to test this out if any of the developers are interested.
[go to top]