zlacker

[parent] [thread] 7 comments
1. esafak+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-05-10 21:53:55
We need this for all ML-generated content. Especially for text.

There must be some industry labeling standard?

replies(4): >>mc32+m >>armcha+dk >>cloudk+xD >>stuckk+EI
2. mc32+m[view] [source] 2023-05-10 21:56:44
>>esafak+(OP)
How do you enforce that with a copy paste of ASCII text? I'm not against disclosure/attribution, but it'd be voluntary.
replies(2): >>dullcr+u1 >>kibibu+Ra
◧◩
3. dullcr+u1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-10 22:04:03
>>mc32+m
Zero-width spaces :)
replies(1): >>pixl97+b6
◧◩◪
4. pixl97+b6[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-10 22:34:28
>>dullcr+u1
So what you're saying is the second tool in everyone's pipeline will be one that removes hidden characters?
◧◩
5. kibibu+Ra[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-10 23:04:19
>>mc32+m
https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.10226

> We propose a watermarking framework for proprietary language models. The watermark can be embedded with negligible impact on text quality, and can be detected using an efficient open-source algorithm without access to the language model API or parameters.

Alpaca uses this already.

6. armcha+dk[view] [source] 2023-05-10 23:54:11
>>esafak+(OP)
I want to see a classifier that takes text and can check the sources to see if the information is accurate. And another model that takes text and rates how much “well-written” it is: bonus points for terseness and clarity.

That way either the AI generated text gets flagged by the classifiers, or the AI generated text is genuinely high-quality and I want it.

7. cloudk+xD[view] [source] 2023-05-11 02:12:03
>>esafak+(OP)
Not sure why you are getting down voted, idea makes sense
8. stuckk+EI[view] [source] 2023-05-11 02:58:56
>>esafak+(OP)
And then use AI to remove the watermark. The perfect circle.
[go to top]