zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. jruoho+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-05-10 12:24:53
A better idea along the same lines: RFC 5785.
replies(2): >>a28002+81 >>chrism+Ul
◧
2. a28002+81[view] [source] 2023-05-10 12:31:47
>>jruoho+(OP)
Ah, yes, but what about RFC 5226?
replies(1): >>jruoho+I1
◧◩
3. jruoho+I1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-10 12:37:11
>>a28002+81
I am not sure about that but I think IANA is quite open to recognizing new well-known URIs:

https://www.iana.org/assignments/well-known-uris/well-known-...

Basically, assuming that you have a spec, I think it amounts to filing a PR or discussing it on a mailing list.

replies(1): >>mnot+Rk
◧◩◪
4. mnot+Rk[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-10 14:11:21
>>jruoho+I1
You can open an issue: https://github.com/protocol-registries/well-known-uris
◧
5. chrism+Ul[view] [source] 2023-05-10 14:15:18
>>jruoho+(OP)
Note that RFC 5785 is obsoleted by RFC 8615.
[go to top]