zlacker

> [1] - they're doing an open beta and letting a little trickle of users on, who post about it on their Twitter/Mastodon/whatever. Feels a bit deliberate, like they're trying to build anticipation and frankly I detest little manipulative things like that so I'm out

Frankly this cynicism feels unwarranted. Bluesky is not a finished product — it is still being built and, even with the small number of invited users so far, there have been problems that have needed attention. The moderation story is still being developed, the feeds are still being tweaked, the app still has bugs, federation still doesn't work yet. Having some users makes for a valuable feedback loop but the team would rapidly become inundated and burnt out (and the platform would possibly turn into a wild-west hellscape with irreversible reputational damage) if they were to open the floodgates entirely at this stage.

>>neilal+(OP)
To clarify - it felt like this was an attempt to replicate the mid-00s play of building interest by restricting who can join and making it exclusive (Facebook did this by rolling it out uni-by-uni, Gmail was for a while invite-only and invites were highly valued) and therefore desirable.

Maybe that's in my head but layering this feeling on top of BlueSky being yet another microblogging service with a few other things that I don't love contributes to my impression of Bluesky being simply "meh". If it becomes the next thing that everyone uses, I'll inevitably have to check it out, I'm not going to be an early adopter though.

>>smcl+j1
Your feelings resonate with me too. My attitude these days is that if a platform wants to make me feel excluded (in order to induce FOMO), then I accept being excluded. They win, I guess?