zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. ec1096+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-05-04 20:27:20
Path based bucket addressing isn't supported anymore, so this must be a legacy bucket: https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/amazon-s3-path-deprecation-...
replies(3): >>voxic1+C4 >>stevek+56 >>electr+Kf
2. voxic1+C4[view] [source] 2023-05-04 20:52:57
>>ec1096+(OP)
Path style access is supported for new buckets, at least for now

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/userguide/access...

3. stevek+56[view] [source] 2023-05-04 20:58:56
>>ec1096+(OP)
The person who did it is in this thread, and apparently you are not correct. It was created yesterday: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35821113

(I don't know anything about this personally, but since a lot of people are indicating an interest in this detail of the story, figured I'd try and surface that link better!)

replies(1): >>ec1096+cT
4. electr+Kf[view] [source] 2023-05-04 21:51:42
>>ec1096+(OP)
No, they indefinitely delayed that deprecation. It's still delayed. I bet[1] it never happens. They haven't figured out what to do with S3 VPC endpoints and buckets with dots in the name, which both to this day require path-based addressing and are both completely legitimate uses. They just stopped talking about this plan entirely and it's been years; I think it's dead.

[1] If they ever actually turn off path-style addressing, come find me and I'll PayPal you a dollar. I don't think it'll ever happen.

◧◩
5. ec1096+cT[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-05 03:54:53
>>stevek+56
Thanks!
replies(1): >>stevek+5V
◧◩◪
6. stevek+5V[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-05 04:14:46
>>ec1096+cT
Any time! I was curious about this too.
[go to top]