zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. jll29+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-05-03 10:29:23
The question is whether one should reduce one's news consumption to only "core" stories. In all likelihood that would show you only today's disasters but not the build-up of tomorrow's.

Personally, I highly recommend you to rely on more than one source of news, ideally with different country and political biases (for instance, I enjoy reading in The Guardian about Germany, and watching Al Jazeera to learn about what's new in the UK).

replies(1): >>krapp+f
2. krapp+f[view] [source] 2023-05-03 10:32:05
>>jll29+(OP)
I feel like if you have to hear about it on "the news" to begin with, it probably isn't relevant to you.
replies(1): >>detaro+aQ
◧◩
3. detaro+aQ[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-03 15:37:59
>>krapp+f
What do you consider "not-news" where one might hear about important things in the (near) future?
replies(1): >>krapp+175
◧◩◪
4. krapp+175[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-04 18:38:18
>>detaro+aQ
If it doesn't affect you personally, it isn't relevant. If it would affect you personally, you'll probably know about it before the news does.
[go to top]