zlacker

Very true, but in all fairness the proposed solution of using Turing machines is pretty reasonable. I think the title is a play on Scott Aaronson's "largest number" game.

>>ravi-d+(OP)
Sure, but where do you stop?

I think a more interesting question is "what's the largest number usefully representable in 64 bits?".

>>yarg+11
My thinking is that the article isn't really investigating the largest number you can share in 64 bits- as you say, it's sort of meaningless. Instead, like the biggest number game, it's a lead in to talk about some neat topics in theoretical computer science