zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. dang+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-04-06 03:56:53
Help me understand how this would make things better.
replies(1): >>ilsomb+GP
2. ilsomb+GP[view] [source] 2023-04-06 11:56:15
>>dang+(OP)
In my perfect world, it would prompt people to reflect on their contributions before actually submitting them.

Ideally this would be a moment to think about whether the contributions meet the guidelines or otherwise move discussion forward.

Edit: to be perfectly clear, I’m asking people to justify their contributions.

replies(1): >>dang+er2
◧◩
3. dang+er2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-04-06 19:37:40
>>ilsomb+GP
I appreciate the intention but unfortunately I don't think that's realistic. It would just lead to a plethora of extremely low quality "explanations".
[go to top]