zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. wizofa+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-04-05 19:58:22
> It would literally have been better if they'd never invented power save mode.

Only if you considered the purpose of power-saving mode to reduce total energy usage, vs to reduce amount of power (and consequent wear & tear) an individual machine uses. However that MS would release a feature like that which automatically kicks in on upgrade without any sort of consideration of what the machine was used for - it could be running life-support systems! - seems an issue. But I'd also expect a fair bit more diligence on behalf of engineers responsible for monitoring and maintaining systems that need 24x7 uptime.

replies(2): >>dylan6+91 >>ChuckN+0r
2. dylan6+91[view] [source] 2023-04-05 20:04:03
>>wizofa+(OP)
>it could be running life-support systems!

i shudder at the thought that a critical piece of life-support anything would be running a windows based OS.

replies(1): >>throit+fl
◧◩
3. throit+fl[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-04-05 21:57:01
>>dylan6+91
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uh64nPT7JWk
4. ChuckN+0r[view] [source] 2023-04-05 22:27:25
>>wizofa+(OP)
> it could be running life-support systems!

Life support systems don't run windows. And if you're running consumer windows on anything critical, you fucked up.

replies(1): >>wizofa+BA
◧◩
5. wizofa+BA[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-04-05 23:22:47
>>ChuckN+0r
Sounds the original use case was an example of something critical enough it shouldn't really have been running on such an OS.
[go to top]