zlacker

[parent] [thread] 7 comments
1. calcul+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-04-01 06:35:17
What about when you try to have a social network without bots?
replies(2): >>throw_+J >>wwwest+71
◧
2. throw_+J[view] [source] 2023-04-01 06:43:01
>>calcul+(OP)
People aren't going to submit themselves to biometric checks just to post stuff on reddit...

These social media will probably die when people realize that they are wasting their time answering bots, but these bots will take over soon or later.

replies(1): >>calcul+T
◧◩
3. calcul+T[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-04-01 06:44:36
>>throw_+J
Ok what about going to court, submitting evidence - a video of someone committing fraud?
replies(2): >>groest+P3 >>notaha+Ss
◧
4. wwwest+71[view] [source] 2023-04-01 06:46:14
>>calcul+(OP)
Which social network doesn't have people as the product?
replies(1): >>capabl+gA
◧◩◪
5. groest+P3[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-04-01 07:15:00
>>calcul+T
What about that?
◧◩◪
6. notaha+Ss[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-04-01 11:57:24
>>calcul+T
I'd rather like it if I was able to submit evidence in court without giving a scan of my iris to an agent working for an overseas registered cryptocurrency startup, and don't really see how Worldcoin helps either way with authenticating my video...
replies(1): >>calcul+FT
◧◩
7. capabl+gA[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-04-01 13:02:04
>>wwwest+71
Any social network not run by a for-profit organization. Secure Scuttlebutt (SSB) being one, Mastodon being another.
◧◩◪◨
8. calcul+FT[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-04-01 15:49:32
>>notaha+Ss
I wasn’t talking about worldcoin but generally. In the future there will have to be changes because everyone would be able to fake a video. Submission has nothing to do with it I was talking about the deepfaked video itself.
[go to top]