zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. wpietr+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-03-19 21:04:43
Are you talking about in-person verification and vouching? Or can it be digitally mediated?

If the former, it looks quite impractical unless there are widely trusted bulk verifiers. E.g., state DMVs.

If the latter, then it all looks quite prone to corruption once bots become as convincing correspondents as the median person.

replies(1): >>coldte+W6
2. coldte+W6[view] [source] 2023-03-19 21:50:21
>>wpietr+(OP)
>Are you talking about in-person verification and vouching? Or can it be digitally mediated?

Yes and yes.

>If the former, it looks quite impractical unless there are widely trusted bulk verifiers. E.g., state DMVs.

It's happened already in some cases, e.g.: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real-name_system

>If the latter, then it all looks quite prone to corruption once bots become as convincing correspondents as the median person

How about a requirement to personally know the other person in what hackers in the past called "meatspace"?

Just brainstorming here, but for a cohesive forum, even of tens of thousands of people, it shouldn't be that difficult to achieve.

For something Facebook / Tweeter scale it would take "bulk verifiers" that are trusted, and where you need to register in person.

[go to top]