zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. teh_kl+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-03-19 05:29:58
Are you paying the maintainer to use their software? If not then you don't really have right to make such demands on them.
replies(3): >>omaran+yq1 >>bakugo+IH1 >>accoun+aG3
◧
2. omaran+yq1[view] [source] 2023-03-19 18:09:37
>>teh_kl+(OP)
I don't think GP said anything about making demands. They said they avoid using that piece of software and that is not a demand on the software's author.
◧
3. bakugo+IH1[view] [source] 2023-03-19 19:53:57
>>teh_kl+(OP)
If you read my comment carefully you'll notice that I at no point demanded that the developers actually fix the issue.

The problem here is simply closing issues that are not fixed because they're "stale", no reason to do this unless you're obsessed with keeping the number of open issues low to deceive people into believing no issues exist. Keeping issues open does not take any effort.

replies(1): >>teh_kl+D72
◧◩
4. teh_kl+D72[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-03-19 22:43:34
>>bakugo+IH1
Go back and read your comment carefully, it's literally a rant about the maintainer.
replies(1): >>bakugo+nt2
◧◩◪
5. bakugo+nt2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-03-20 01:01:49
>>teh_kl+D72
Yes, it is. What point are you trying to make here? Being a maintainer of open source software does not elevate you above criticism.
◧
6. accoun+aG3[view] [source] 2023-03-20 12:20:57
>>teh_kl+(OP)
I can be upset with people lying to me even if I don't pay them and there is nothing wrong with avoiding projects engaging in such behavior and warning others about them.
[go to top]