zlacker

[parent] [thread] 6 comments
1. sidlls+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-03-06 00:06:10
We've recently hired a bunch of ex-Googlers (as well as Twitter-ers and other laid off people). They seem to spend most of their time making sure everyone here knows they're ex-${big_name} and how awesome things were there and we should change everything to do it the same way. It's a bit of a put-off.
replies(2): >>pinewu+sg >>ido+oB
2. pinewu+sg[view] [source] 2023-03-06 02:14:23
>>sidlls+(OP)
If one thinks about it, they were minions in a monopoly, and a pretty dysfunctional one at that even if lucrative. What the heck do they know about how to run a competitive business?
3. ido+oB[view] [source] 2023-03-06 06:15:03
>>sidlls+(OP)
Is this not visible to the people with authority to fire them/not hire more such people? Or do they think differently than you?
replies(2): >>aflag+iP >>pinewu+Es1
◧◩
4. aflag+iP[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-03-06 08:51:55
>>ido+oB
People are not usually fired for being obnoxious.
replies(1): >>ido+fo5
◧◩
5. pinewu+Es1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-03-06 14:23:28
>>ido+oB
I think the attitude is that the industry analysts view “big names” as a structural positive not bothering to think about the actual reality. Also when you hire one of them in a senior position, suddenly you now have a gang of them as new subsidiary VPs.
◧◩◪
6. ido+fo5[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-03-07 15:32:09
>>aflag+iP
It sound like the person we're replying too implied they were also not very effective at their jobs.
replies(1): >>aflag+rj7
◧◩◪◨
7. aflag+rj7[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-03-08 01:07:51
>>ido+fo5
I'd be surprised if he really spent most of his time repeating that he worked at Google. That's certainly hyperbole.
[go to top]