zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. taeric+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-03-05 15:26:10
This implies that they could not have pushed OpenGL to be less of a mess. Feels bad faith to argue, when you consider how bad all drivers were back then.
replies(1): >>Jasper+zA
2. Jasper+zA[view] [source] 2023-03-05 18:50:59
>>taeric+(OP)
Everybody wanted this. There was even an attempt at this, called "Long's Peak", that was ultimately voted down by the OpenGL committee after a long development road. Nobody else needed to sabotage OpenGL, Khronos was more than happy to do it themselves.
replies(1): >>david-+As2
◧◩
3. david-+As2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-03-06 11:39:10
>>Jasper+zA
> Khronos was more than happy to do it themselves.

I was involved in a few of those committees, and sadly I have to agree.

The reason Khronos is often so slow to adopt features is because how hard it is for a group of competitors to agree on something. Everybody has an incentive to make the standard follow their hardware.

A notable exception to this was the OpenCL committee, which was effectively strongarmed by Apple. Everybody wanted Apple's business, so nobody offered much resistance to what Apple wanted.

[go to top]